¬ернутьс€   ‘орум TRINITY > ”влечени€ >  ино

ќпции темы ќпции просмотра
—тарый 30.05.2019, 00:49   #1
–егистраци€: 21.05.2019
—ообщений: 7,424
Bdsepjzcc пока неопределено
ќтправить сообщение дл€ Bdsepjzcc с помощью AIM ќтправить сообщение дл€ Bdsepjzcc с помощью Yahoo
ѕо умолчанию chernobyl hbo 5 episode [HBO]

Chernobyl Episode 5 HBO. УChernobylФ. HBO

Chernobyl Episode 5 Episode 6 HBO. УChernobylФ. HBO
chernobyl hbo 5 episode 1 2 3 4 5 watch online

Chernobyl Episode 5 Episode 6 HBO. УChernobylФ. HBO

Only humans could have made Chernobyl happen, only humans could have solved the problem of Chernobyl. This is a hard-to-watch but deeply important miniseries in times where the pressure to disband regulations and gut the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) are at an all-time crescendo in the USA. Incidentally and thanks to our more stringent regulatory agencies, the nuclear power industry in the west operates under a set of strict regulations. In the USA, nuclear reactors are built inside containment buildings. The USA had the Three Mile Island partial meltdown, yet almost no radiation escaped into the atmosphere. Chernobyl in the cash-strapped Soviet Union had no building around it (or any of their Soviet reactors). We learn by watching Chernobyl that they were designed to deliver massive amounts of power at the lowest cost. They also had no safety nets for the worse case scenario. They weaved personal stories, all deftly stitched together, and were well served by a crack team of below-the-line craftspeople whose special effects, makeup, and set design excelled at every level. You can see their production carefully researched the physical effects of radiation exposure at different degrees of contamination. Also, the top-level production design is on display, which includes set decoration of authentically dressed Soviet offices and homes. It is not easy to pull off these visually important details yet they do it exceptionally. Who is in Chernobyl? Harris has the right amount of restraint and fury at the perfect moments and no one could have filled out this role any better. He should be included on the shortlists for critics at awards time for his portrayal of Legasov. The secondary story is of Lyudmilla Ignatenko (Jessie Buckley) the pregnant wife of fated firefighter (Adam Nagatis) who was a first responder walking among the lethal graphite debris field. His physical deterioration his hard to watch. Chernobyl Episode 5 watch online. He plays a cat and mouse game with Mulder, eventually baiting him into a sick game of Russian roulette with he, Mulder, and Scully. Everyone always say they like the episode for Lily Tomlin, but there are so many other reasons to like the episode. ThereвАЩs Ed Asner, and a clever script. An endearing part of the episode was the mere fact that on Christmas Eve, Mulder would go ghost hunting, and trick Scully into coming. The first act is delightful to watch, and probably one of my favorite interaction between Mulder and Scully. I find this episode vastly underrated which I suspect is because it comes right after the pilot, and the pilot gets a lot more attention. вАЬDeep ThroatвАЭ further pushed the concept of Scully the Skeptic and Mulder the Believer, introduced their season one ally, and of course featured Seth Green as a pothead. Eugene Victor Tooms is one of the best monsters in The X-Files with his special ability to stretch and appetite for human liver. The story went away from the alien storyline, focusing on a totally separate issue. Surprisingly, it was the first monster-of-the-week episode, and it was very good.|HBOвАШs Chernobyl (2019): Season 1, Episode 1: 1:23:45 TV Mini-series Review, from the 18th Annual Tribeca Film Festival, begins with a pre-title scene that takes place years later. The story itself, however, begins with the moment of the accident that takes place at Chernobyl nuclear power plant in the USSR. Chernobyl explores the aftermath of that moment through the perspectives of plant employees, government leadership, townspeople, healthcare workers, and the scientists who played major roles in making sense of the accident and working to lessen its impact. Though Chernobyl is a dramatic retelling, its representation stays very much in the factual realm. Characters rarely express their feelings or interpretations of the events; instead they state the facts and continue working. Whether this behavior was a cultural reality, an artistic choice, or both, its effect is to conjure all of the viewerвАЩs emotional responses in the space between what is said and what is real. Yes, viewing the events of Chernobyl was terrifying. He insists, despite irradiated eyewitness accounts, that the core cannot have exploded. So he is not our hero. Maybe itвАЩs going to be the nurse at the nearby hospital, who takes a squiz at the raging fire at the local nuclear power plant and wonders if they have any iodine tablets in stock, just in case. вАЭ says the doctor cheerfully, silhouetted in front of the orange-blue glow of the raging fire at the local nuclear power plant. Dyatlov refuses to countenance the suggestion from underlings that the radiation readings from the plantвАЩs geiger counter-type thing are inaccurate because it has maxed out rather than taking a faithful record. Amid the depicted and narrative chaos, which involves repeated вАЬrevealsвАЭ of the shattered core - it looks like a nuclear apocalypse in there! вАЩs water valves will kill the men who do it, but will save the lives of millions. I assume that it will do this by averting something worse than a nuclear reactorвАЩs core exploding and scattering itself over a wide area, but what this is I am not sure. The two men in charge of the safety test that immediately preceded the disaster go down and start turning wheels and obliquely noting that, contrary to their claims in the control room, they did do something wrong during the test. We should be engaged by the tragic flaws and nobility of all this by this point, but the story and characters have gone so uncorralled that it takes all your viewing energy just to keep it fractionally straight. Things may improve over the coming weeks as the smoke clears, and I hope so. Chernobyl is a story that has everything, but at the moment, comrades, justice is not being done to it.|From what I've heard it's extremely accurate about the portrayal of 1980s life in the USSR, and stuff relating to the accident is dramatized to an extent but usually relatively accurate on the whole. I've heard episode 5 will give much more hard data on the disaster, and interviews with the showrunners have shown that they know their stuff and are committed to keeping things as accurate as possible. We do know why it blew up. Long story short is poorly trained workers doing a test on a terribly designed reactor. There are youtube videos and such that give a much better detailed explanation with graphics and such if you search, but to give a brief summary, the main problem was the reactor. Reactors need to have something between the nuclear rods to slow down the neutrons and keep the chain reaction going. We call this a neutron moderator. Most US reactors use water as the moderator. The Chernobyl reactor used graphite. When a nuclear reaction starts to get out of hand, it generates a lot of heat. What that means depends on your reactor. That coupled with the design of the control rods used to shut down the reaction. The control rods had a graphite tip so as not to screw with the reaction while they weren't inserted. But when things went balls up and they inserted them, that meant that the graphite tips actually increased the reaction speed as they were inserted into the reactor, helping it to go further out of control. Chernobyl 5 Episode.
Is the recent HBO show Chernobyl accurate? How much of it is fiction? I was thinking it was a documentary but some of it sounds exaggerated to make the story more interesting. According to the creator, via the show's HBO podcast, much of what they depict is accurate based on first hand accounts. They take a lot of dramatic license, but most is still accurate. She wasn't a real person, but is a composite character of many physicists who came forward. Did people receive so much radiation that they bled through their skin? If your skin becomes sufficiently degraded by the radiation. Was it ever possible for the damaged reactor to explode like a nuclear bomb? No, Chernobyl did not explode in such a way; nor can any nuclear reactor. The Chernobyl explosion was a steam explosion. That specific type of reactor had a positive feedback loop where it would continually release more and more neutrons and get hotter and hotter, this was mitigated by graphite modulators that absorbed the neutrons and water cooling. The day of the explosion, they were running a safety test. Chernobyl Episode 6 watch online.

Chernobyl Episode 5 Episode 6 HBO. УChernobylФ. HBO

Chernobyl Episode 5 Episode 6 HBO. УChernobylФ. HBO

Chernobyl Episode 5 Episode 6 HBO. УChernobylФ. HBO

Chernobyl Episode 5 Episode 6 HBO. УChernobylФ. HBO

Chernobyl Episode 5 Episode 6 HBO. УChernobylФ. HBO

Chernobyl Episode 5 Episode 6 HBO. УChernobylФ. HBO
»скренне желаем вам славного обожаемых Video online
Bdsepjzcc на форуме   ќтветить с цитированием

ќпции темы
ќпции просмотра

¬аши права в разделе
¬ы не можете создавать новые темы
¬ы не можете отвечать в темах
¬ы не можете прикрепл€ть вложени€
¬ы не можете редактировать свои сообщени€

BB коды ¬кл.
[IMG] код ¬кл.
HTML код ¬ыкл.

Ѕыстрый переход